Believe nothing you read in Reuters. Here’s why.

They are liars.  Moreover, if you can’t determine the Trump administration from an authoritarian regime, then you are an idiot, in which case, even when you’re not lying how could you possibly have anything to say that I would deem worth hearing?

Here’s bit of festooning for a Reuter’s tree already filled with droopy turds:

“Stephen Jukes, global news editor for Reuters, the British wire service, has ordered his scribes not to use the word terror to refer to the Sept. 11 atrocity, the Washington Post’s Howard Kurtz reports. ‘We all know that one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter and that Reuters upholds the principle that we do not use the word terrorist,’ Jukes writes in an internal memo. “To be frank, it adds little to call the attack on the World Trade Center a terrorist attack.”

Jukes tells Kurtz: “We’re trying to treat everyone on a level playing field.”

So the fucking idiot running this nuthouse doesn’t think 9/11 was an act of terror, but Trump is a dictator.  This kind of stupid is beyond redemption.

 Reuters, as with so many other “news” agencies, has long been irrelevant.  I believe nothing I read from them.  But they may as well keep lying; at this point, criticism is like hanging a dead man.  But if I split Jukes head open with a baseball bat, please remember that I’m actually a “freedom fighter.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *